October 24, 2017 / 5:18 AM / a year ago

Fitch: Japan Election Result to Bolster Policy Implementation

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) HONG KONG/SINGAPORE, October 24 (Fitch) The ruling LDP's victory in Japan's general election on 22 October has bolstered the standing of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and should strengthen his hand in implementing his political and economic agenda. A twice-delayed consumption tax hike now looks more likely to be implemented in October 2019, owing to Abe renewing his commitment to the increase in the run-up to the election and evidence of stronger momentum in the economy. A consumption tax hike could have a positive effect on public debt dynamics to the extent that increased revenue is earmarked for debt consolidation, says Fitch Ratings. The LDP has retained its "super-majority" of two-thirds of the seats in the lower house of parliament. This gives Abe a mandate to continue the "Abenomics" economic strategy launched in early 2013 that aims to revive growth and end deflation through the three "arrows" of loose monetary policy, fiscal flexibility and structural reforms. Importantly, Abe will now be able to re-appoint Haruhiko Kuroda as Bank of Japan governor when Kuroda's term ends in April 2018, or choose a successor supportive of accommodative policies. Revisions to Japan's historical GDP data in late 2016 suggest the economy has performed better under Abenomics than previously thought, even if the strategy has been less successful in pushing inflation up toward the 2% target. The revisions bring the national accounts data in line with 2008 United Nations Standards; and by expanding inclusion of R&D spending, capture how far Japan has shifted towards R&D-intensive sectors. More recently, the economy has continued to benefit from loose financial conditions and supportive fiscal policy, as well as robust external demand and a tight labour market. Real GDP grew by 0.6% qoq in 2Q17, as public investment and private consumption rose at their strongest pace in over five years. We expect GDP to grow by 1.5% in 2017 - up from 1.0% in 2016. The improved economic outlook has lowered risks associated with the public debt trajectory, and was a key factor in Fitch's decision to revise our Outlook on Japan to Stable from Negative in April 2017, when the rating was affirmed at 'A'. Nevertheless, high public debt remains a key fiscal policy constraint and rating weakness. The gross general government debt/GDP ratio is by far the highest among Fitch-rated sovereigns, at 230% of GDP in 2016, and our baseline projections show it rising to 238% by 2024. Abe's indication during the election campaign that his government will proceed with a consumption tax hike from 8% to 10% in October 2019 may have a positive impact on these baseline debt projections, which do not currently factor in a rise during the next decade. Fitch has previously calculated that the consumption tax hike could reduce the fiscal deficit by around 0.8pp per year in the medium term - and stabilise the public debt/GDP ratio - if the proceeds were used predominantly for debt consolidation. However, Abe has said that JPY2 trillion of the projected JPY5 trillion raised will be spent on social spending, such as education and childcare provision. This will dampen - but not eliminate - the positive effect of the tax hike on debt dynamics. The government was due to review its fiscal strategy during the fiscal year ending 2019, and we expect more clarity once the review is complete. Prospects for structural reform remain limited, despite the convincing election win. There have been pockets of success in supply-side reform since 2013, such as a rise in labour force participation. However, there is still little sign of the transformative breakthrough needed to boost long-term growth significantly and achieve the government's "economic revitalisation" scenario. Contact: Stephen Schwartz Senior Director Sovereigns +852 2263 9938 Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited 19/F Man Yee Building 68 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong Dan Martin Senior Analyst Fitch Wire +65 6796 7232 Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: leslie.tan@fitchratings.com; Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@fitchratings.com. The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below