Reuters logo
Fitch Revises Outlook for Japan's Shizuoka Bank to Stable; Affirms Suruga Bank at 'A-'/Stable
May 12, 2017 / 9:08 AM / 7 months ago

Fitch Revises Outlook for Japan's Shizuoka Bank to Stable; Affirms Suruga Bank at 'A-'/Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) TOKYO, May 12 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has revised the Outlook for The Shizuoka Bank, Ltd. to Stable from Negative and affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A'. In addition, Fitch has affirmed Suruga Bank Ltd.'s IDR at 'A-' with a Stable Outlook. A full list of rating action is at the end of this commentary. The Outlook revision for Shizuoka follows the affirmation of Japan's sovereign rating at 'A' and revision of the Outlook to Stable from Negative on 27 April 2017 (see <a href=" ">Fitch Revises Outlook on Japan to Stable; Affirms at 'A'.) Fitch expects the operating environment for Japanese banks to stabilise. Market sentiment has begun to improve as the domestic economy gains some positive momentum leading to low positive, instead of negative, domestic market interest rates. As a result, we have changed our outlook on the banking system to stable from negative as cyclical pressure is easing and credit costs remain low. This will support the stabilisation of Japanese regional banks' earnings in the fiscal year ending March 2018 (FYE18). Fitch believes regional banks that serve respective domestic regions' financial needs will remain more vulnerable to low interest rates and the competitive environment than Japan's major banks. This is due to their high dependence on interest revenue, with limited diversification of revenue sources, such as fees and overseas businesses. KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRS AND VIABILITY RATING (VR) The IDRs of Shizuoka and Suruga are driven by their VRs. Shizuoka's VR of 'a' reflects its strong capitalisation (with an FCC ratio of 17% and common equity tier 1 ratio of 16.3% at FYE17), which Fitch expects can be sustained over the medium term, although it will become more challenging should pressure on profitability increase. The bank has a leading franchise in Shizuoka Prefecture and potential buffers against credit-risk through high guarantee/collateral coverage, including public guarantees. Constraining factors for Shizuoka's VR include limited options to diversify its revenue base and the prevailing low interest rates coupled with intense competition increasingly pressuring profitability due to the bank's reliance on lending. Suruga's VR of 'a-' factors in its above-domestic peer profitability, with a return on assets of 0.9% for the nine months ending 2016, compared with the mega bank average of 0.4% and Shizuoka's 0.3%. Its operating profit/risk weighted assets ratio for the same period was 2.5%, compared with the mega bank average of 1.1% and Shizuoka's 0.7%. Suruga has also improved its net interest margin, with increased balance in higher-yield non-housing loans, whereas the net interest margins of domestic peers contracted. The bank's high profitability is backed by its unique business model, which differentiates itself from typical Japanese commercial banks by providing multi-purpose loans to a range of retail clients. Profitability is also supported by Suruga's proactive risk control, although to some degree it may reflect the bank's higher risk appetite. Suruga's VR is constrained by a lack of diversification due to its concentration on retail lending and small asset size, with consolidated total assets of JPY4.5 trillion at end-2016, compared with Shizuoka's JPY12 trillion. Strong funding and liquidity, sustained by a firm deposit base, are key strengths for Japan's banking system and underpin both banks' ratings. In addition, the banks' credit profiles are underpinned by adequate risk controls and buffers, particularly in terms of earning capacity. The Stable Outlook for Shizuoka's and Suruga's IDRs reflects the stable domestic operating environment and Fitch's view that overall asset quality will remain favourable and loss absorption buffers are sufficiently strong relative to the ratings. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR Shizuoka's Support Rating of '2' and Support Rating Floor of 'BBB-' reflect Fitch's view that the sovereign has a strong propensity to support the bank, if necessary, due to Shizuoka's size relative to other banks in its prefecture and nationally. The bank accounts for 31% and 24% of Shizuoka prefecture's loans and deposits, respectively. Fitch believes the sovereign's propensity to support Suruga, which has a Support Rating of '4' and a Support Rating Floor of 'B', would be more limited due to its marginal systemic importance to Japan's financial system and small operational size, ranking 33rd in net asset size. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS AND VR Both banks' VRs and IDRs could be downgraded if unexpected deterioration in the operating environment increases performance volatility, resulting in the banks taking more risk, especially credit risk - the bulk of these banks' risks - without a corresponding increase in loss-absorption buffers. This also includes increased exposure to market risk, although Fitch expects it to be small, or involvement in industry consolidation, leading to potentially higher volatility in earnings or capital. Shizuoka's VR is sensitive to further downward pressure on profitability to a level that would affect its solid capitalisation, narrowing the gap between it and domestic peers. Its VR and IDR could also face negative rating action if the sovereign's rating or our Outlook on the rating was revised downward, in light of its ratings proximity to the sovereign. There is limited upside scope to Shizuoka's VR as it is rated at the same level as the sovereign. Suruga's VR is sensitive to the bank adopting a higher risk appetite to defend its competitive position without increasing its loss absorption buffers. Positive rating action for Suruga is likely to stem from further structural improvement in the domestic operating environment, leading to sustainable loan expansion and faster internal capital generation without a large increase in risk appetite. However, Fitch believes such structural improvement will take some time. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR Shizuoka's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor are sensitive to a change in Fitch's assessment of the sovereign's ability and willingness to support the bank. A downgrade in the sovereign's ratings to 'A-' or below would be likely to lead to a downgrade in Shizuoka's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor. Suruga's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor are not immediately sensitive to the sovereign rating, as Fitch already factors in a limited probability of support. Changes to the regulatory support framework could lead to a change in our perception about the sovereign's propensity to support Suruga. The rating actions are as follows: Shizuoka: - Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs affirmed at 'A'; Outlook revised to Stable from Negative - Short-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs affirmed at 'F1' - Viability Rating affirmed at 'a' - Support Rating affirmed at '2' - Support Rating Floor affirmed at 'BBB-' Suruga: - Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs affirmed at 'A-'; Outlook Stable - Short-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs affirmed at 'F1' - Viability Rating affirmed at 'a-' - Support Rating affirmed at '4' - Support Rating Floor affirmed at 'B' Contact: Primary Analyst Kaori Nishizawa Director +81 3 3288 2783 Fitch Ratings Japan Limited Kojimachi Crystal City East Wing 3F 4-8 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0083 Secondary Analyst Naoki Morimura Director +81 3 3288 2686 Committee Chairperson Parson Singha Senior Director +66 2108 0151 Summary of Financial Statement Adjustments: Total assets and total liabilities exclude acceptances and guarantees from Japan's generally accepted accounting principles balance sheet to be globally comparable. Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below