December 18, 2017 / 3:11 PM / a year ago

Fitch Upgrades Basisbank, Affirms Two Other Georgian Mid-Sized Banks

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) MOSCOW/LONDON, December 18 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has upgraded Basisbank's (Basis) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'B+' from 'B' and affirmed Cartu Bank's (Cartu) and Halyk Bank Georgia's (HBG) IDRs at 'B+' and 'BB-', respectively. Fitch has revised the Outlook on Cartu to Negative from Stable. The Outlooks on Basis and HBG are Stable. Fitch has also upgraded Basis's Viability Rating (VR) to 'b+' from 'b' and affirmed Cartu's VR at 'b+'. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary. KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRS, VIABILITY RATINGS (VRs) Basis's and Cartu's IDRs are driven by the banks' standalone creditworthiness, as expressed by their VRs. The upgrade of Basis's Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR reflects the upgrade of the bank's VR. The latter captures the bank's extended track record of profitable growth, while maintaining reasonable asset quality metrics and a solid capital cushion. The affirmation of Cartu's ratings and revision of the Outlook to Negative factors in the pressures the bank faces as a result of deteriorating asset quality, which could also negatively impact performance and capitalisation. Basis's and Cartu's VRs also consider high loan dollarisation levels (end-3Q17: 68% and 71%, respectively), sizeable balance sheet concentrations, the risks associated with largely unseasoned loan books after recent rapid growth and franchise limitations. The ratings also factor in both banks' reasonable profitability metrics, sizeable equity cushions and moderate refinancing risks. HBG's IDRs are driven by the potential support it may receive, if needed, from its sole shareholder Halyk Bank of Kazakhstan (HBK, BB/Stable). The one-notch differential between HBK's and HBG's IDRs reflects the cross-border nature of the parent-subsidiary relationship, and the so far limited track record and contribution of the Georgian subsidiary to overall group performance. The Stable Outlook on HBG mirrors that on the parent. Fitch has not assigned a VR to HBG because of its high management and operational integration with HBK and significant reliance on parent funding. BASIS's VR At end-1H17, Basis's non-performing loans (NPLs, overdue more than 90 days) remained low at 2.2% of loans, fully covered by reserves. Performing restructured loans contributed a further 4.4% of loans (13% of equity) and were weakly provisioned. Regulatory impaired loans (the bottom three risk categories) were broadly stable, at 4.5% of loans at end-3Q17, and almost fully covered by reserves. High FX lending, mostly to unhedged borrowers, and large borrower and sector concentrations heighten the bank's risk profile. At end-1H17 the largest 25 groups of borrowers amounted to a sizeable 50% of loans or 1.5x equity. The bank's lending growth was very rapid at 54% on average in 2014-2015, but moderated to 21% in 2016-1H17. Profitability metrics have been good, supported by still wide margins, although these are decreasing due to high competition, and growing economies of scale. Low risk costs (the annualised loan impairment charges/average gross loans ratio was 1% in 9M17, according to regulatory accounts) also support the bottom line, with solid annualised ROAA and ROAE of 2.4% and 13.1%, respectively, in 9M17 (2016: 2.9% and 15.4%). We expect Basis's profitability will continue to benefit from lending growth, while asset quality trends remain key to performance. The capital cushion is solid. At end-2016 (the date of the latest available IFRS accounts) the Fitch Core Capital (FCC) ratio was a high 24%. The regulatory Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio was adequate at 15.3% at end-3Q17 (reflecting the high 175% risk weight applied for loans denominated in foreign-currency loans), allowing the bank to additionally reserve up to 10% of gross loans without breaching the minimum required regulatory capital ratios. Customer funding (66% of total liabilities at end-3Q17) is generally stable, albeit highly concentrated - top 10 groups of depositors comprised a sizeable 59% of total customer accounts. Related-party funding was 11% of liabilities. Non-deposit funding was mainly in the form of term loans from IFIs (24%) with limited refinancing risks on these. At end-3Q17, liquid assets (mainly cash and equivalents, but also a portion of unencumbered securities) covered 45% of customer accounts. CARTU's VR NPLs at Cartu grew to 12.9% of end-1H17 loans from 11.7% at end-2016, covered 82% by reserves. These were mostly from the corporate lending segment and included legacy exposures originated in 2011 (43% of the total NPLs). Regulatory impaired loans grew to a large 33% at end-3Q17 from 22% at end-2016 and reserve coverage was a modest 42%. Regulatory impaired loans captured most of the major exposures, which Fitch has identified to be of higher risk, mainly due to the borrowers' weak or deteriorating financial profiles. These exposures represented 30% of loans or, net of specific reserves, were equal to 1.3x of end-3Q17 equity. Cartu's lending remained highly concentrated. At end-1H17, exposure to the top 25 groups of borrowers made up 57% of total gross loans (equal to 2.5x equity); the largest construction and real estate segment accounted for 21% of loans. The bank's recent credit growth was rapid at around 45% on average in 2014-2015 but slowed sharply to around zero on average in 2016-1H17. Profitability metrics are reasonable, with annualised ROAA and ROAE of 1.4% and 7.9%, respectively, in 9M17. Loan impairment charges were equal to a relatively high 3% of average gross loans in 9M17 (annualised) although recoveries from previously written-off loans have underpinned the net results. We expect that provisioning requirements will remain high given weakening asset quality and large unreserved problem assets that will keep performance under pressure. Cartu's FCC ratio was a solid 19% at end-2016. The regulatory Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio stood at a lower 11.4% as of end-3Q17, allowing the bank to create additional reserves equal to a moderate 7% of loans. Subordinated debt contributed by the shareholder, equal to 13% of risk-weighted assets, could help protect senior creditors in case of erosion of the bank's core capital. However, Fitch has not notched up the bank's Long-Term IDR (which captures default risk on senior obligations) from the VR (which reflects failure risk) due to significant uncertainty about recapitalisation needs in case of failure. Customer funds (77% of liabilities) are highly concentrated and could be volatile. The top 10 groups of depositors comprised 47% of total customer funding. Wholesale funding has been low. The liquidity cushion is reasonable: at end-3Q17, liquid assets (mainly cash and equivalents, but also a portion of unencumbered securities) covered around 45% of Cartu's total deposits. SUPPORT RATINGS AND SUPPORT RATING FLOORS Basis and Cartu's Support Ratings of '5' and Support Rating Floors of 'No Floor' reflect the two banks' limited systemic importance, and consequently Fitch's view that state support cannot be relied upon. Potential support from the private shareholders is also not factored into the ratings, as it cannot be reliably assessed. HBG's Support Rating of '3' reflects the moderate probability of support from HBK. RATING SENSITIVITIES BASIS, CARTU Cartu's ratings could be downgraded if the increased provisioning of impaired exposures results in significant capital erosion. Downward pressures on Basis could arise if there is a material weakening of asset quality metrics, resulting in deterioration of the bank's profitability and capital. Diversification of the banks' profiles and improvements in asset quality metrics (Cartu) would be credit positive. HBG HBG's support-driven Long-Term IDR is sensitive to changes in Fitch's assessment of support from its parent bank. The rating actions are as follows: JSC Basisbank Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: upgraded to 'B+' from 'B'; Outlook Stable Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B' Viability Rating: upgraded to 'b+' from 'b' Support Rating: affirmed at '5' Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'No floor' Cartu Bank Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B+'; Outlook revised to Negative from Stable Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B' Viability Rating: affirmed at 'b+' Support Rating: affirmed at '5' Support Rating Floor: affirmed at 'No Floor' Halyk Bank Georgia Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: affirmed at 'BB-', Outlook Stable Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR: affirmed at 'B' Support Rating: affirmed at '3' Contact: Primary Analyst Alyona Agrenenko Associate Director +7 495 956 2409 Fitch Ratings CIS Ltd 26 Valovaya Street Moscow Secondary Analyst Konstantin Alekseenko Analyst +7 495 956 2401 Committee Chairperson Alexander Danilov Senior Director +7 495 956 24 08 Media Relations: Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email:; Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO’s credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see here), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below