Reuters logo
Fitch Upgrades Postbank to 'A-'/Negative on Deutsche's Restructuring Announcement
March 13, 2017 / 4:29 PM / 9 months ago

Fitch Upgrades Postbank to 'A-'/Negative on Deutsche's Restructuring Announcement

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) FRANKFURT/LONDON, March 13 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has upgraded Deutsche Postbank AG's (PB) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'A-' from 'BBB+' and Short-Term IDR to 'F1' from 'F2'. The Outlook on the Long-Term IDR is Negative. PB's Support Rating (SR) has been upgraded to '1' from '2'. The bank's Viability Rating (VR) is unaffected. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this rating action commentary. The rating actions reflect the announcement on 5 March 2017 by PB's parent, Deutsche Bank AG (DB, A-/Negative/F1/a-), that it is abandoning its plans to sell PB. As a result, DB intends to retain and reintegrate PB into its own German retail banking business. A separate rating action commentary outlining the rating actions on DB is available at KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRS, SR AND SENIOR DEBT The upgrade of PB's SR and the equalisation of its IDRs and senior debt ratings with those of DB reflect our view that PB will regain its former status as a core business under DB's revised strategy. We understand from the announcement that DB intends to eventually fully integrate PB into its own German operations within its Private & Commercial Bank segment during the next few years. In our opinion, this should result in an extremely high probability of support from DB, if needed. We believe that PB is likely to play an integral role in realising DB's revised business objectives including a repositioning in German retail banking, operational synergies and cost optimisation. We also understand that existing regulatory limitations to funding fungibility between DB and PB are likely to be lifted as a result of PB's reintegration into DB. The announced strategic revision marks the second reversal of DB's strategic approach to PB, after it decided in 2015 to prepare a sale of its subsidiary. Therefore, we believe that future material deviations from this strategy are highly unlikely given the potential severe reputational damage to DB that could result from another strategic shift. This underpins our view that DB's commitment to PB's strong integration is hardly reversible. We view the control and profit and loss transfer agreement between PB and DB via PB's intermediate parent, DB Finanz-Holding GmbH, as a strong indication of institutional support. Following the strategic revision, the previously planned termination of the agreement, which has been in place for several years, now appears highly unlikely. DEPOSIT RATINGS The upgrade of PB's Deposit Ratings mirrors the IDRs' upgrade. We have not notched up its Deposit Ratings from its IDRs due to the uncertain sustainability of PB's qualifying subordinated and senior vanilla debt buffer given the bank's deposit-focused funding mix. SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES The legacy hybrid capital securities, issued by Deutsche Postbank Funding Trust I-IV and subject to phasing-out under the EU's Capital Requirements Regulation, are notched twice for non-performance risk and twice for loss severity from DB's VR, reflecting our expectation that DB's support for PB would extend to PB's hybrid instruments. These have been removed from Rating Watch Negative (RWN) to reflect our expectation that DB's propensity of support is highly unlikely to decrease, now that it has abandoned its plans to sell PB. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, SR AND SENIOR DEBT Institutional support from DB now drives PB's IDRs and senior debt ratings, which are therefore primarily sensitive to changes in DB's IDRs. PB's IDRs, senior debt ratings and SR are also sensitive to any unexpected reversal in DB's integration strategy for PB or changes in our assumptions around DB's propensity or ability to provide PB with timely support if needed. SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES The hybrid securities issued by Deutsche Postbank Funding Trusts I-IV are primarily sensitive to DB's VR. DEPOSIT RATINGS PB's Deposit Ratings are sensitive to changes in the bank's IDRs. They are also potentially sensitive to the amount of qualifying debt buffer relative to the recapitalisation amount likely to be needed to restore PB's viability and prevent a default on its deposits. In addition, we could upgrade PB's Long-Term Deposit Rating when we have more visibility into PB's inclusion in DB's resolution plans following the bank's reintegration into DB's operations. Uplift for PB's Long-Term Deposit Rating from the bank's Long-Term IDR could be warranted if we believe that DB's large qualifying debt buffer would offer material incremental probability of default protection to PB's depositors or provide comfort that their recoveries in a default scenario would be above average. The rating actions are as follows: Deutsche Postbank AG Long-Term IDR: upgraded to 'A-' from 'BBB+'; Outlook Negative Short-Term IDR: upgraded to 'F1' from 'F2' Viability Rating: 'bbb+' unaffected Support Rating: upgraded to '1' from '2'; off RWN Senior debt and debt issuance programme ratings: upgraded to 'A-'/'F1' from 'BBB+'/'F2' Senior unsecured guaranteed bonds issued by the former DSL Bank: 'AA' unaffected Long-Term Deposit Rating: upgraded to 'A-' from 'BBB+' Short-Term Deposit Rating: upgraded to 'F1' from 'F2' Deutsche Postbank Funding Trust I-IV's hybrid securities: affirmed at 'BB+'; off RWN Contact: Primary Analyst Patrick Rioual Senior Director +49 69 76 80 76 123 Fitch Deutschland GmbH Neue Mainzer Strasse 46-50 60311 Frankfurt am Main Secondary Analyst Lola Yusupova Associate Director +49 69 768076 114 Committee Chairperson Gordon Scott Managing Director +44 20 3530 1075 Media Relations: Elaine Bailey, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1153, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1020480 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below