Reuters logo
Fitch: China's Debt-For-Equity Swaps Face Implementation Risks
October 14, 2016 / 9:16 AM / a year ago

Fitch: China's Debt-For-Equity Swaps Face Implementation Risks

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SHANGHAI/SINGAPORE, October 14 (Fitch) China's debt-for-equity swaps aim to reduce headline corporate leverage ratios, but are unlikely to change the underlying structural risks in the economy to any great extent, says Fitch Ratings. The market-oriented framework should help to draw in private investment, if implemented successfully. However, there is a risk that the scheme may be compromised by implicit government influence and a lack of transparency on the relationships between the parties involved. Moreover, the authorities have yet to outline plans to deal with the bigger problem of debt residing with 'zombie' companies. The State Council (SC) on 10 October provided guidelines on debt-for-equity swaps as part of a strategy to reduce corporate sector debt, which was equivalent to 169% of GDP in 1Q16. Debt-for-equity swaps could in principle act as a relatively growth-friendly route to corporate deleveraging. The scheme has been designed to address issues raised in the Chinese media when Premier Li first proposed debt-for-equity swaps in March - most notably that banks would be compelled to swap bad loans for equity to keep failing 'zombie' companies alive. Banks will need to transfer loans to "qualified implementing agencies", which will then convert the loans into equity. The conversion price is to be "market-oriented" and negotiated by banks, investors, debtors and the implementing agencies. The SC's guidelines also state that banks will not be forced into transactions and that firms with no prospects will not be eligible for debt-to-equity swaps. The idea is that banks, after an initial write-down, will transfer exposure to new investors in the converted equity. Implementing agencies are expected to raise funding from external investors to support the swaps, and the market-driven approach of the scheme could make that easier. However, implementation will be key. One risk is that banks could use related parties as implementing agencies. The SC's directive also allows for debt-to-equity to be funded by 'social capital', which is likely to include mutual funds and wealth management products (WMPs). This raises the possibility of banks retaining their exposure to corporates through complicated ownership and transaction structures that lack transparency. For example, banks' exposure to troubled companies might simply move off-balance sheet if bank-linked WMPs are used to fund swaps. Another risk is that the process will be prone to government influence. Government has said it will not assume responsibility for any losses involved, and will not intervene in transactions. However, high levels of moral hazard pervade China's financial sector, and banks are likely to feel pressure to support the government's policy objective of addressing over indebtedness. These problems raise doubts over whether 'zombie' firms will really be kept out of the scheme. If the scheme is run along the lines proposed, it will only deal with excess leverage in some parts of the economy. Banks will still be left with exposure to the most troubled corporates, which make up a large segment of the corporate debt market and arguably pose the biggest risks to asset quality. Fitch has long argued that banks will be central to the resolution of China's debt overhang, and that central government funds will be needed to recapitalise the sector if absorption buffers are depleted as losses are realised. Debt-for-equity swaps are unlikely to change that view. Contacts: Katie Chen Associate Director +886 2 8175 7614 Fitch Australia Pty Ltd, Taiwan Branch Suite 1306, 13F, 205, Tun Hwa North Road Taipei City, Taiwan Jack Yuan Associate Director Financial Institutions +86 21 5097 3038 Dan Martin Senior Analyst Fitch Wire +65 6796 7232 Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email:; Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below