* EBRD study finds no improvement in Russia’s commodity dependence
* State-led drive to diversify economy delivers poor results
* Red tape, graft, lack of skills hold back business development
By Jason Bush
MOSCOW, Dec 14 (Reuters) - Russia’s attempts to wean itself off its chronic dependence on natural resources have failed to deliver tangible results, a study by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) showed on Friday.
The 96-page “Diversifying Russia” report makes sober reading for the government of President Vladimir Putin. Russia, the world’s largest oil and gas producer, has in recent years launched one initiative after another aimed at reducing its over-reliance on commodities by promoting alternative sectors.
But none of this burst of activity is having any visible impact on the overall economic structure of Russia’s $1.9 trillion economy, the report says.
“The basic point here is that, for all the efforts and for all the talk, it hasn’t improved,” said Eric Berglof, chief economist at the EBRD, the London-based development bank set up to aid post-Communist economic transition.
“They haven’t managed in the end to make a dent into the natural resource dependence.”
High reliance on exports of commodities can be a curse because it makes an economy more vulnerable to fickle international prices and because these sectors have limited long-term growth potential.
The EBRD’s analysis suggests that, if anything, Russia’s commodity dependence has only increased since Putin first became president in 2000.
Oil and gas now account for around two-thirds of Russia’s exports by value, up from 40-50 percent in the late 1990s.
When semi-processed goods such as metals and chemicals are added, commodities now account for around 90 percent of exports, a share that has budged little in price-adjusted terms.
In other ways too, Russia’s economy remains poorly diversified, with little evidence of improvement.
Small and medium-sized businesses, which produce almost 40 percent of gross domestic product in the European Union, contribute only around 15 percent of Russia‘s. Mid-sized firms, a driver of innovation elsewhere, are conspicuously lacking.
“That’s not the structure you see in a well-developed and well-diversified economy,” Berglof told Reuters in an interview.
The EBRD’s conclusions come despite a series of high-profile initiatives - often dubbed state-led or top-down modernisation - to promote new sectors outside the commodity industries.
A state-backed venture fund launched in 2006 was meant to kick-start the fledgling venture capital industry. And Rusnano, a state corporation created in 2007, has ploughed billions of dollars into nanotechnology and other high-tech projects.
Russia also has high hopes for Skolkovo, a tech park outside Moscow dubbed Russia’s answer to Silicon Valley, and the Russian Direct Investment Fund, a state-backed private equity fund created to woo foreign strategic investors.
But all these moves, the EBRD believes, may largely be missing the point. “A lot of these initiatives are what we call vertical - where the government goes in to address specific sectors or specific companies,” said Berglof.
“You need to try and work on a broader horizontal agenda. That has to do with competition policy, education, and facilitating the entry and exit of firms.”
When it comes to improving the broader business environment, for example by cracking down on notorious red tape and corruption, Russia’s efforts have left much to be desired.
The EBRD found that more than half of business licences were not legally required - implying that steps taken by the government to reduce the regulatory burden are largely ignored by lower-level bureaucrats.
Innovation and diversification are also held back by chronic skills shortages, with Russians performing poorly in international comparisons of educational standards and management skills.
But the EBRD did find a glimmer of hope amid all this gloomy data. It found remarkable regional variations in business conditions, suggesting that Russia could learn from regional success stories.
For example, Ulyanovsk, a seemingly unremarkable industrial region on the Volga, had the best business conditions overall.
“It is possible to improve the business climate in Russia because a lot of regions have managed to do so,” said Berglof. “And that’s an encouraging sign.”