Reuters logo
Apple unlocking case not 'trailblazer' for precedent - FBI chief
February 25, 2016 / 3:37 PM / 2 years ago

Apple unlocking case not 'trailblazer' for precedent - FBI chief

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The case involving a court order demanding Apple help the FBI unlock the iPhone linked to one of the San Bernardino shooters is “unlikely to be a trailblazer” for setting a precedent for other cases, FBI Director James Comey told a congressional panel Thursday.

The complex and evolving nature of mobile phone software will limit how broadly the case can be applied, Comey said during a U.S. House of Representatives Intelligence Committee hearing examining worldwide threats.

While the case “will be instructive for other courts,” larger policy questions about reasonable law enforcement access to encrypted data will likely need to be resolved by Congress and others, Comey said.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is seeking Apple’s help in accessing a county-owned iPhone 5C used by Syed Rizwan Farook, who along with his wife went on a shooting rampage in December that killed 14 and wounded 22. Last week, it obtained a court order from a California magistrate asking Apple to comply.

Apple has said the request amounts to asking a company to hack its own device and would set a troubling precedent for how companies must comply with law enforcement.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the congressional panel, also warned that “I don’t see a limiting principle” in the Apple case.

People gather at a small rally in support of Apple's refusal to help the FBI access the cell phone of a gunman involved in the killings of 14 people in San Bernardino, in Santa Monica, California, February 23, 2016. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

“While the result may only affect this phone, the precedent may be there for many others,” Schiff, who represents California, said.

Apple CEO Tim Cook told ABC News on Wednesday the company is willing to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.

A demonstrator holds a sign during a protest against the FBI's request to extract data from iPhones in cases across the country, outside the Apple Store in New York February 23, 2016. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

U.S. intelligence officials have long warned that the expanded prevalence of strong encryption poses a “Going Dark” problem where they are unable to monitor the communications of criminal suspects and thwart potential plots.

But technologists and privacy advocates warn that undermining encryption would expose data to hackers and jeopardise the integrity of the Internet.

The U.S. Justice Department contends it is asking only for Apple to disable “non-encrypted barriers” on the San Bernardino phone, such as a feature that deletes data after ten consecutive incorrect passcode guesses.

While both Apple and the FBI have said they would like Congress to help resolve the dispute over encryption, legislative proposals have failed to gain momentum.

The encryption debate “is the hardest question I’ve seen in government,” Comey said.

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below