LONDON/ATHENS (Reuters) - A British museum spirited one of the world’s most hotly disputed artistic masterpieces to Russia for a loan on Friday, causing an outcry in Greece, which says the priceless 2,500-year-old statue was looted from Athens and must be returned.
The marble statues from the facade of the Parthenon, among the greatest works of ancient Greek art, have been the subject of acrimonious dispute since they were taken from Athens by the Earl of Elgin, bought by the British state and placed in London’s British Museum in 1816.
The museum announced on Friday that it had sent one of the marbles - a headless, reclining nude sculpture of the river god Ilissos - to the Hermitage in St. Petersburg, home town of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
It portrayed the loan as proof that Britain was keeping the marbles on behalf of all humanity, and a sign of how culture can rise above diplomatic division at a time when Anglo-Russian relations have frozen to post-Cold War lows over Ukraine.
“Both institutions believe it is precisely at moments like this that the museums have to keep speaking,” British Museum director Neil MacGregor told BBC radio.
It was the first time any of the marbles had left Britain since arriving two centuries ago. The decision was not announced until the statue was already safely in Russia, where it will go on display as part of an exhibition to mark the Hermitage’s 250th anniversary.
Greece has fought for generations to have the sculptures returned, in recent years hiring international lawyer Amal Clooney, newlywed wife of movie star George, to make its case. She was not available for comment, but has said in the past she wants a friendly resolution.
Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras said the loan to Russia “provokes the Greek people” and demolishes what he described as one of the British arguments for keeping the marbles: that they were too fragile to be moved.
“Greeks identify themselves with their history and their culture, which cannot be parcelled out, loaned or given away,” Samaras said in a statement. Greek newspapers fumed: the leading Ta Nea called the decision a “show of power”.
Samaras opened a new, state-of-the-art museum at the Acropolis in 2009, which Greece says destroys another British argument, that Greece lacked the facilities to protect the treasures and display them properly for the world.
For all the bluster, the head of the New Acropolis museum, Dimitris Pantermalis, told Reuters the loan could bring closer the day when the marbles are finally displayed in Greece.
“You see, they can be moved,” Pantermalis said. “In the same way, they can be returned to Greece one day.”
Greek officials said they did not plan to make aggressive moves to reclaim the statue while it was in Russia, such as demanding Moscow send it to Athens rather than back to London. They are seeking a settlement through U.N. cultural body UNESCO.
David Hill, chairman of the International Association for the Reunification of the Parthenon Sculptures, said the loan to Russia was “highly provocative” and a “very rude gesture”.
“The overwhelming majority of public and professional opinion, even in the UK, is that the British should return the collection to be reunited in Greece,” he said.
A spokeswoman for Prime Minister David Cameron said the decision was up to the museum.
“We recognise that this will be a really interesting exhibition for the people of Russia,” the spokeswoman said. “Our view is clear that it is the property of the British Museum and it’s up to the trustees there to decide how they exhibit it.”
Additional reporting by Andrew Osborn; Writing by Guy Faulconbridge, Stephen Addison and Peter Graff