(Please be advised that paragraph 6 contains reference to language that some reasders may find offensive)
By Jonathan Stempel and Carrick Mollenkamp
NEW YORK (Reuters) - In a rare move, New York’s top bank regulator threatened to strip the state banking license of Standard Chartered Plc, saying it was a “rogue institution” that hid $250 billion in transactions tied to Iran, in violation of U.S. law.
The New York State Department of Financial Services on Monday said the bank “schemed” with the Iranian government and hid from law-enforcement officials 60,000 secret transactions in order to generate hundreds of millions of dollars in fees.
At the same time, it exposed the U.S. banking system to terrorists, drug traffickers and corrupt states, the department said.
The loss of a New York banking license would be a devastating blow for a foreign bank, effectively cutting off direct access to the U.S. bank market. Standard Chartered processes $190 billion every day for global clients, the New York bank regulator said.
In a rare look inside a bank, the regulator described how Standard Chartered officials debated whether to continue Iranian dealings. In October 2006, the top official for business in the Americas, whom the regulator did not name, warned in a “panicked message” that the Iranian dealings could cause “catastrophic reputational damage” and “serious criminal liability.”
A top executive in London shot back: “You f---ing Americans. Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we’re not going to deal with Iranians.” The reply showed “obvious contempt for U.S. banking regulations,” the regulator said.
Standard Chartered is the third British bank to be ensnared in U.S. law-enforcement probes this summer. Barclays Plc agreed to pay $453 million to settle U.S. and UK probes that it rigged a global benchmark in June. A month later, a U.S. Senate panel issued a scathing report that criticized HSBC Holding Plc’s efforts to police suspect transactions, including Mexican drug traffickers.
A Standard Chartered spokesman said the bank “is conducting a review of its historical U.S. sanctions compliance and is discussing that review with U.S. enforcement agencies and regulators. The group cannot predict when this review and these discussions will be completed or what the outcome will be.”
Standard Chartered, a financier in emerging markets, is the sixth foreign bank since 2008 to be implicated in dealings with sanctioned countries such as Iran in investigations led by federal and New York law-enforcement officials.
Four banks -- Barclays Plc, Lloyds Banking Group, Credit Suisse Group and ING Bank NV -- have agreed to fines and settlements totalling $1.8 billion. HSBC Holdings Plc currently is under investigation by U.S. law enforcement, according to bank regulatory filings.
The New York regulator, headed by former prosecutor Benjamin Lawsky, ordered Standard Chartered to explain why the bank should not lose its state license and the ability to process dollar transactions. Lawsky also ordered the bank to bring in an outside consultant to monitor its transactions.
“Standard Chartered Bank operated as a rogue institution,” Lawsky said in the order.
In an unusual move, the regulator also found fault with an outside consultant -- Deloitte LLP -- because the firm “apparently aided” the bank in its deception.
A report by Deloitte had “intentionally omitted critical information” when submitted to regulators, it said. A Deloitte spokesman did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Deloitte was hired to conduct a review after Standard Chartered in 2004 was ordered by New York and federal regulators to correct anti-money laundering lapses. The review, known as a “look back,” was supposed to identify suspicious transactions between 2002 and 2004. But at one point, Standard Chartered asked Deloitte to “delete” references to certain improper Iranian transactions, according to the New York order.
In a subsequent email, a Deloitte partner said the firm had “agreed” to the request because it was “too politically sensitive for both (Standard Chartered) and Deloitte. That is why I drafted the watered-down version.”
In 2007, that report enabled Standard Chartered to show regulators in had corrected flaws in its anti-money laundering systems.
While Monday’s order came from Lawsky’s office, probes into how banks carried out transactions tied to Iran primarily have been led by the district attorney’s office in Manhattan and the U.S. Justice Department. The district attorney’s office, better known for prosecuting crime in New York City, established itself as a leading money-laundering investigator in the 1990s when it probed the Bank of Credit & Commerce International, or BCCI.
Probes by the Manhattan district attorney and Justice Department date to 2006 and have targeted some nine banks. Britain’s Barclays agreed to pay $298 million in 2010 after admitting it processed payments for clients tied to Cuba, Sudan and other countries. Lloyds and Credit Suisse agreed to pay settlements of $350 million and $536 million.
In June, ING agreed to pay $619 million to settle allegations that it, too, violated U.S. sanctions against Cuba, Iran and other countries. It was the biggest fine levied against a bank for sanctions violations.
The bank, founded in 1853, is headquartered in London, but it specializes in financing in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
The Iranian Embassy in Washington was not immediately available to comment. The Justice Department, working with the FBI in New York, is also investigating Standard Chartered’s activities for violations of U.S. sanctions.
Lawsky said Standard Chartered moved money through its New York branch on behalf of Iranian financial clients, including the Central Bank of Iran and state-owned Bank Saderat and Bank Melli, that were subject to U.S. sanctions.
Monday’s order alleged that Standard Chartered removed codes on money transfers and altered message fields, inserting phrases such as “NO NAME GIVEN” to hide the nature of the transactions.
At the center were the alleged “U-Turn” transactions, money moved for Iranian clients among banks in Britain and Middle East and cleared through Standard Chartered’s New York branch, but which neither started nor ended in Iran.
Such transactions were permissible until November 2008, when the Treasury Department prohibited them on concerns that they were being used to evade sanctions, and that Iran was using banks to fund nuclear and missile development programs.
The New York order also alleged that even as some banks exited the U-Turn transactions, Standard Chartered hustled to “take the abandoned market share.” In a December 2006 memo titled, “Project Gazelle, Report on Iranian Business,” bankers discussed how to increase “wallet share” with Iranian clients.
Standard Chartered’s stock fell 8% in the final 15 minutes of trading in London amid reports of the U.S. probe. Standard Chartered shares closed down 6.2 percent at 14.70 pounds.
Chairman John Peace, CEO Peter Sands and Finance Director Richard Meddings could not be reached for comment, and the bank declined to comment beyond its brief statement.
Additional reporting by Dena Aubin, Joseph Ax, Emily Flitter in New York, Aruna Viswanatha in Washington, D.C. and Steve Slater in London; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Leslie Gevirtz