WASHINGTON/BEIJING (Reuters) - China backtracked on substantial commitments it made during trade talks with the United States, prompting President Donald Trump to impose additional tariffs on Chinese goods slated to go into effect on Friday, top U.S. trade officials said on Monday.
The swift deterioration in negotiations between the world’s two largest economies hit global financial markets as investors faced the prospect of an escalation rather than an end to a 10-month-old trade war.
Trump tweeted on Sunday that he would raise tariffs on $200 billion (152 billion pounds) worth of Chinese goods to 25 percent from 10 percent by the end of the week, and would “soon” target the remaining Chinese imports with tariffs, sending stocks and oil prices lower on Monday.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, who has been an advocate for tough structural changes in China, said Beijing had reneged on commitments it had made previously that would have changed the agreement substantially.
“Over the course of the last week or so we have seen ... an erosion in commitments by China,” Lighthizer told reporters. “That in our view is unacceptable.”
Chinese Vice Premier Liu He is expected to be in Washington on Thursday and Friday for further talks.
“We’re not breaking off talks at this point. But for now ... come Friday there will be tariffs in place,” Lighthizer said.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, considered to be less hawkish towards China, said China’s backtracking became clear with “new information” over the weekend. He declined to give specifics and said the U.S. side had originally hoped to conclude a deal one way or the other this week.
“They were trying to go back on language that had been previously negotiated, very clear language, that had the potential of changing the deal dramatically,” Mnuchin said. “The entire economic team ... are completely unified and recommended to the president to move forward with tariffs if we are not able to conclude a deal by the end of the week.”
A spokesman at the Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to queries about the U.S. assertions.
“We are also in the process of understanding the relevant situation. What I can tell you is that China’s team is preparing to go to the United States for the discussions,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said on Monday in Beijing.
China has repeatedly said it will make changes to open its economy according to its own timeline, not in response to trade disputes.
But recently it has enacted new laws and amended others, moves some see as efforts to address concerns shared by the United States and other foreign investors, including those from China’s largest trading partner, the European Union.
In March, China fast-tracked the approval of a new Foreign Investment Law, with Premier Li Keqiang pledging that the government would follow through and enforce the legislation giving protection to foreign firms.
Last month, the standing committee of China’s largely rubber-stamp parliament amended three laws to strengthen trade secrets protections, take further measures to stop forced technology transfers and increase trademark infringement punishments.
Trump’s announcement on Sunday abruptly ended a five-month truce in a trade war that has cost the two countries billions of dollars, slowed global growth and disrupted manufacturing supply chains and U.S. farm exports.
Businesses, while largely supportive of Trump’s tough stance on China, want the tariffs to be lifted. Mnuchin said on Monday the stock market reaction was not affecting U.S. decisions on the talks.
A person familiar with the negotiations said the latest dispute came after the Chinese sought to deal with policy changes through administrative and regulatory actions, not through changes to Chinese law as previously agreed.
“It undermines the core architecture of the deal,” the person said, adding that not codifying the concessions would make it difficult to verify and enforce China’s compliance.
While it is unclear which changes to law the United States has demanded, critics say even though such amendments are welcomed, they do not provide guarantees because Chinese courts are controlled by the ruling Communist Party.
U.S. officials have acknowledged this, and insist only tariffs can provide leverage to enforce an agreement.
The United States is demanding sweeping changes to China’s economic policies, including better protection of U.S. intellectual property, and an end to forced technology transfers from U.S. companies and cyber theft of American trade secrets.
Washington also wants more access to China’s markets for U.S. businesses, curbs on industrial subsidies and increased purchases of American products.
Another source familiar with the situation said Trump had reiterated to advisers in recent days he would walk away from a trade deal with China if it was not strong enough.
China’s nationalist Global Times tabloid said in an editorial on Tuesday that the foreign ministry’s suggestion it would still send a delegation to the United States after Trump’s remarks showed that China would remain calm and “focus on the talks rather than engage in public opinion warfare”.
“Even if the negotiations break down and Washington comprehensively raises tariffs, that does not mean the door to talks is closed,” the paper said, adding that the impact on China of such a failure would be “controllable”.
The United States imported about $539.5 billion in goods from China in 2018 and exported $120.3 billion, for a record trade deficit of $419.2 billion, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.
Trump lashed out over the trade deficit with China on Monday. “With China we lose 500 Billion Dollars. Sorry, we’re not going to be doing that anymore!” he tweeted.
The United States currently has 25 percent tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese machinery and technology goods, and 10 percent tariffs on $200 billion of products from computer modems and routers to furniture, lighting and building materials.
Negotiations on removing U.S. tariffs have been one of the remaining sticking points. China wants the tariffs to be removed. U.S. officials want to keep some, if not all, as part of any final deal to ensure China lives up to its commitments.
Reporting by Jeff Mason, David Lawder, Alexandra Alper, and Susan Heavey in Washington; and Ben Blanchard, Michael Martina, Shu Zhang, Jing Xu, Cheng Leng and Yawen Chen in Beijing; editing by Rosalba O'Brien and Simon Cameron-Moore